Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Rosh Hashanah 4:3

ת"ר מת באדר ועמד אחר תחתיו באדר מונין שנה לזה ולזה מת בניסן ועמד אחר תחתיו בניסן מונין שנה לזה ולזה מת באדר ועמד אחר תחתיו בניסן מונין ראשונה לראשון ושניה לשני

Our Rabbis learnt: If [a king] died in Adar and was succeeded by another in Adar, we can designate [the rest of] the year [up to the first of Nisan] as belonging to either.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., we can regard the remaining days of the year as belonging either to the last year of the late king or the first year of the new king.');"><sup>2</sup></span> If he died in Nisan and was succeeded by another in Nisan, we can date the year by either.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And similarly if the second ascended the throne in any other month of the year.');"><sup>3</sup></span> If he died in Adar and was succeeded by another in Nisan, the earlier year is dated by the first and the later by the second.

Rashi on Rosh Hashanah

For both of them - Someone who writes a document in the Adar after the first's ascension can write either in year x of the dead king or can write in the first year of the new king
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi on Rosh Hashanah

He died in Nissan and a successor took over in Nissan [of that same year] - and it is the law that if he ascended in any month that until the coming Nissan can use both the count of the dead king and that of the new one.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi on Rosh Hashanah

and the second year to the second king - He who writes "from x's ascension" does not count the second year to the dead king because this year was not his and the first isn't counted to the second [king] because he hadn't ascended then rather the second is counted as the second [king's] first year.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse